1. 1. Poppi, D.P., Norton, B.W., Minson, D.J. and Hendricksen, R.E., 1980. The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. Agric Sci (Camb). 94: 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600028859

2. 2. Banchorndhevakul, S., 2002. Effect of urea and urea-gamma treatments on cellulose degradation of Thai rice straw and corn stalk. Radiat Phys Chem. 64: 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806 X (01)00678-8

3. 3. Ghanbari, F., Ghoorchi, T., Shawrang, P., Mansouri, H. and Torbatinejad, N.M., 2015. Ruminal disappearance of protein and amino acids of untreated and treated canola meal with gamma ray and electron beam. Anim Prod. 17(1): 83-93. doi: 10.22059/jap. 2015. 54022. (In Persian)

4. 4. Ensminger, M.E., Oldfield, J.E. and Heinemann, W.W., 1990. Feed and Nutrition. Second edition. Ensminger publishing company. 388-389.

5. 5. Stsnton, T.L. and Whittier, J., 2007. Urea and NPN for cattle and sheep. Colorado state university. Extension. http//: www.ext.Colostate.ed/ pubs/livestock/ 01608.htm. No.1. P: 608.

6. 6. Newbold, J., 1997. Proposed mechanisms for enzymes as modifiers of ruminal fermentation. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium, Gainesville, FL, USA. 146-159.

7. 7. Beauchemin, K.A. and Rode, L.M., 1996. Use of feed enzymes in ruminant nutrition. In Rode L.M. (ed) Animal Science Research and Development Meeting Future Challenges. Proc Can Soc Anim Sci, Lethbridge. 103-130.

8. 8. Colombatto, D., Mould, F.L., Bhat, M.K., Morgavi, D.P., Beauchemin, K.A. and Owen, E., 2003. Influence of fibrolytic enzymes on the hydrolysis and fermentation of pure cellulose and xylan by mixed ruminal micro organisms in vitro. J Anim Sci. 81(4): 1040-1050. doi: 10. 2527/2003.8141040x

9. 9. Feng, P., Hunt, C.W., Pritchard, G.T. and Julien, W.E., 1996. Effect of enzyme preparations on in situ and in vitro degradation and in vivo digestive characteristics of mature cool-season grass forage in beef steers. J Anim Sci. 74: 1349-1357. doi: 10. 2 527/1996.7461349x

10. 10. Nocek, J.E., 1988. In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility, A Review. J Dairy Sci. 67: 2599-2612. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S00 22-0302(88)79781-7

11. 11. Gargallo, S., Calsamiglia, S. and Ferret. A., 2006. Technical note: A modified three-step in vitro procedure to determine intestinal digestion of proteins. J Anim Sci. 84: 2163-2167. doi: 10.2527/jas.2004-704

12. 12. SAS/STAT User's Guide. 2003. Version 9.1 Edition. SAS Inst. Cary, NC.

13. 13. Menke, K. and Steinggass, H., 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value from chemical analyses and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Develop. 28: 7-55.

14. 14. Getachew, G., Crovetto, G.M., Fondevila, M., Krishnamoorthy, U., Singh, B., Spanghero, M., Steingass, H., Robinson, P.H. and Kailas, M.M., 2002. Laboratory variation of 24 h in vitro gas production and estimated metabolizable energy values of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 102: 169-180. https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0377-84 01(02)00212-2

15. 15. Ghiasvand, M., Rezayazdi, K. and Dehghan Banadaki, M., 2012. The effects of different processing methods on chemical composition and ruminal degradability of canola straw and its effect on fattening performance of male Holstein calves, Journal of Anim Sci Res. 22(1): 93. (In Persian)

16. 16. Van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutrition ecology in the ruminants. Cornel university press. Ithaca, New York, Comstock publishing associate. 156-176.

17. 17. Gunun, P., Wanapat, M. and Anantasook, N., 2013. Effects of physical form and urea treatment of rice straw on rumen fermentation, microbial protein synthesis and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers. Asian-australas J Anim Sci. 26(12): 1689-1697. https://doi.org/10.5713/ ajas.2013.13190

18. 18. Mehdikhani Bazehoze, J., Yazdani, A.R., Torbatinegad, N.M. and Ghorbani, B., 2009. Effect of treating wheat straw with urea and molasses on crude protein and crude fiber of it and blood metabolites of Dalagh lamb. J Agri Sci Natural Resour. 16 ((SPECIAL ISSUE 2)): 333-337. (In Persian)

19. 19. Celik, K.I., Ersoy, E. and Savran, F., 2003. Feeding of urea treated wheat straw in Saanen goat male kids. Pakistan J Nutrition. 2: 258-261. doi: 10.3923/pjn.2003. 258.261

20. 20. Khorasani, H., Shojaeian, K., Yousef, M., Lahi, E. and Sharifi M., 2014. Effects of urea, molasses and fibrolytic enzymes on nutritional value of date palm leaves silage. Annu Res Rev Biol. 4(24): 4305-4313. doi: 10.9734/ ARRB/2014/7307

21. 21. Alikhani, M., Alamooti, A.A., Ghorbani, Gh. R. and Sadeghi, N., 2005. Effect of urea, molasses and a bacterial inoculant on chemical composition and dry matter degradability of sunflower silage. J Crop Prod. 9(3): 171-183. http://jcpp.iut.ac.ir/article-1-373-en.html

22. 22. Mc Donald, L., Henderson, N. and Heron, S., 1990. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed., Chalcombe Pub., UK.

23. 23. De Figuerido, M. and Marais, J.P., 1994. The effect of bacterial inoculants on kikuyu silage quality. J Agric Sci Cambridge. 122: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185 9600065795

24. 24. Alam, M.K., Ogata, Y., Sato, Y. and Sano, H., 2016. Effects of rice straw supplemented with urea and molasses on intermediary metabolism of plasma glucose and leucine in sheep. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 29(4): 523-529. https://doi.org/10.5713/ ajas.15.0358

25. 25. Alvarez, G., Pinos-Rodriguez, J.M., Herrera, J.G., Garcia, J.C., Gonzalez, S.S. and Barcena, R., 2009. Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal digestibility in steers fed high fibre rations. Livest Sci. 121: 150-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.20 08.05.024

26. 26. Gado, H.M., Salem, A.Z.M., Odongo, NE. and Borhami, B.E., 2011. Influence of exogenous enzymes ensiled with orange pulp on digestion, blood metabolites and growth performance in lambs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 165: 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. anifeedsci. 2011.02.016

27. 27. Gado, H.M., Salem, A.Z.M., Robinson, P.H. and Hasan, M., 2009. Influence of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, extent of ruminal fermentation as well as milk production and composition in dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 154: 36-46. https:// doi.org/10. 1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.07.006

28. 28. Yu, P., Mckinnon, J.J. and Christensen, D.A., 2005. Improving the nutritional value of oat hulls for ruminant animals with pre-treatment of a multi-enzyme cocktail: in vitro studies. J Anim Sci. 83: 1133-1141. doi: 10.2527/ 2005.8351133x

29. 29. Titi, H.H. and Lubbadeh, W.F., 2004. Effect of feeding cellulase enzyme on productive responses of pregnant and lactating ewes and goats. Small Rumin Res. 52: 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00254-2

30. 30. Muwalla, M.M, Haddad, S.G. and Hijazeen, M.A., 2007. Effect of fibrolytic enzyme inclusion in high concentrate fattening diets on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs. Livest Sci. 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci. 2007.03.003

31. 31. Mahmoodi, A. and Aliarabi H., 2012. Effect of using different levels of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on performance of early lactation Holstein cows. Anim Sci Res. 22(2): 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015. 09.001

32. 32. Beauchemin, K.A., Rode, L.M., Maekaw, M., Morgavi, D. and Kampen, R., 2000. Evaluation of a nonstarch polysaccharides feed enzyme in dairy cow diets. J Dairy Sci. 83: 543-553. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-03 02(00)74914-9

33. 33. Yang, W.Z., Beauchemin, K.A. and Rode, L.M., 1999. Effects of an enzyme feed additive on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 82: 391-403. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75245-8

34. 34. Kung, L.J.R., Lazartic, J., Wuerfel, R.L., Rode, L.M., Beauchemin, K.A. and Treacher, R.J., 2000. The effect of various combinations of fibrolytic enzymes on the feeding value of a TMR fed to lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 83(1): 297.

35. 35. Kung, L.J.R., Treacher, R.J., Nauman, G.A., Smagala, A.M., Endres, K.M. and Cohen, M.A., 2000. The effect of treating forages with fibrolytic enzymes on its nutritive value and lactation performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 83: 115-122. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74862-4

36. 36. Karimi, A., Safaei, A. and Aghashahi, A., 2019. Evaluation of the effect of treated maize stalklage with urea and molasses in fattening performance of Turky Ghashghaii male lambs. J Anim Environ. 11(3): 45-50. doi: 20.1001.1.27171388.1398.11.3.6.0

37. 37. Zinn, R.A. and Salinas, J., 1999. Influence of Fibrozyme on digestive function and growth performance of feedlot steers fed a 78% concentrate growing diet. in Proc. 15th Annu. Symp. Biotechnology in the Feed Industr Loughborough, Leics, UK. 313-319.

38. 38. Yang, W.Z., Beauchemin, K.A. and Rode, L.M., 2000. A comparison of methods of adding fibrolytic enzymes to lactating cow diets. J Dairy Sci. 83: 2512-2520. https://doi.org/ 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75143-5

39. 39. Elghandour, M.M.Y., Salem, A.Z.M., Gonzalez Ronquillo, M., Borquez, J.L., Gado, H.M., Odongo, N.E. and Penuelas, C.G., 2013. Effects of exogenous enzymes on in vitro gas production kinetics and ruminal fermentation of four fibrous feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 179: 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci. 2012.11.010

40. 40. Soltani Naseri, K., Ghanbari, F., Bayat Kouhsar, J. and Taliey, F., 2018. Effect of Chemical and Biological Processing Methods on Chemical Composition, Gas Production Parameters and In Vitro Digestibility of Cicer Arietinum Wastes. Res Anim Prod. 9(22): 72-82. doi: 10. 29252/rap.9.22.72

41. 41. Shoryabi, Z., 2014. Study of chemical composition and nutritive value of treated sesame straw by using in vitro gas production method. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences. ISSN 2322-5149.

42. 42. Mohammadabadi, T. and Chaji, M., 2011. Effect of exogenous enzyme on in vitro fermentation of sesame straw by rumen bacteria culture. J Appl Anim Res. 39: 161-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2011.565227

43. 43. Gemeda, B.S., Hassen, A. and Odongo, N.E., 2014. Effect of fibrolytic enzyme products at different levels on in vitro ruminal fermentation of low-quality feeds and total mixed ration. J Anim Plant Sci. 24(5): 1293-1302. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43587

44. 44. Yang, H.E, Son, Y.S. and Beauchemin, K.A., 2011. Effects of exogenous enzymes on ruminal fermentation and degradability of alfalfa hay and rice straw. Asian Aust J Anim Sci. 24: 56-64. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas. 2011.90369

45. 45. Sujani, M., Piyasena, T., Seresinhe, T., Pathirana, I. and Gajaweera, Ch., 2016. Supplementation of rice straw (Oryza sativa) with exogenous fibrolytic enzymes improves in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 41: 4. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1 503-8

46. 46. Mashayekhi, M.R., Fazaeli, H. and Zahedifar, M., 2007. Effect of Urea-Molasses on the Nutritive Value of Roughage Based Ration Incubated in Buffaloe Rumen Liquor. Ital J Anim Sci. 6: 454-457. doi: 10.4081/ijas. 2007.s2.454

47. 47. Dryhurst, D. and Wood, C.D., 1998. The effect of nitrogen source and concentration on in vitro gas production using rumen micro-organisms. Anim Feed Sci Techno. 71: 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401 (97)00124-7

48. 48. Yulistiani, D., Jelan, Z.A., Liang, J.B., Yaakub dan, H. and Abdullah, N., 2007. Penggunaan teknik in vitro produksi gas untuk mengevaluasi pengaruh supplementasi molasses pada pakan basal campuran jerami dan hijauan murbei (Morus alba). JITV 12(4): 255-261.

49. 49. Wolin, M.J., 1960. A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. J Dairy Sci. 43: 1452-1459.

50. 50. Getachew, G., Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K., 1998. The in vitro gas coupled with ammonia measurement for evaluation of nitrogen degradability in low quality roughages using incubation medium of different buffering capacity. J Sci Food Agric. 77: 87-95. https://doi.org/10. 1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199805)77:1<87:AID-SFA7>3.0. CO;2-X

51. 51. Mould, F.L., Kliem, K.E., Morgan, R. and Mauricio, R.M., 2005. In vitro microbial inoculum: A review of its function and properties. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 123-124: 31- 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.028

52. 52. Bueno, I.C.S., Sergio Calbral Filho, S.L.S., Gobbo, S.P., Louvandini, H., Vitti, D.M.S.S. and Abdalla, A.L., 2005. Influence of inoculum source in a gas production method. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 124: 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci. 2005.05.003

53. 53. Hervas, G., Frutusos, P., Giraldez, F.J., Mora, M.J., Fernandez, B. and Mantecon, A.R., 2005. Effect of preservation on fermentative activity of rumen fluid inoculum for in vitro gas production techniques. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 123-124: 107-118. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.05.004

54. 54. Ehsani, P., Teimouri, Yansari, A.A., Chashnidel, Y. and Ghorbani, G., 2019. The effect of Particle size and harvesting steps of forage corn on silage characteristics, digestibility and Nutrients consumption of Holstein dairy cows. J Anim Environ. 11(2): 53-62.

55. 55. Shahraki, E. and Saravani, M., 2013. A Study on the Effects of Urea and Molasses on the Nutritional Value of Nutgrass (Cyperus Rotundus) Forage Silos of Sistan Region. Int Res J Applied. 6 (12): 1793-1800.

56. 56. Xing, L., Chen, L.J. and Han, L.J., 2009. The effect of an inoculants and enzymes on fermentation and nutritive value of sorghum straw silages. J Bio Tech. 100: 488-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.017

57. 57. Parand, E. and Taghizadeh, A., 2011. Examination of digestibility of processed barley grain with different methods, using gas production technique with two sources of inocola. Anim Sci Res. 20-24(2): 1-13.

58. 58. Naraghi Rad, Z., Ghoreishi, S. and Kargar, S., 2021. Chemical Composition and In Vitro Digestibility of Pomegranate Byproducts in Ruminant diet. J Anim Environ. 13(2): 67-74. doi: 10.22034/aej.2021.135375