[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Indexing




..
:: Volume 1, Issue 4 (12-2025) ::
Journalaer 2025, 1(4): 1-12 Back to browse issues page
Fit protein interaction network based on gene expression data for dairy cattle fertilit
Seyyed Homayoun Farhangfar , Mahdi Zeya * , Elham Behdani , Mohamadbagher Montazertorbati
Abstract:   (1161 Views)
Introduction: Reproductive traits in the livestock industry are of significant importance, and this importance is continuously increasing over time. The significance lies in the direct impact these traits have on the profitability of livestock breeding units, garnering increasing attention day by day. Fertility rate is one of the crucial traits in the field of animal husbandry, reflecting an animal's ability to produce offspring and new generations. For livestock producers, fertility rate holds great importance as its improvement leads to enhanced production levels and efficiency in the breeding unit. In the field of bioinformatics, identifying genes within genomic sequences is of paramount importance. Genes serve as the fundamental units of heredity, encapsulating information about the structure and function of cells and organisms. This study aims to investigate the protein-protein interaction network influencing dairy cow fertility based on gene expression data.
Materials & Methods: To investigate the mechanisms of the effect of microRNAs on fertility, a gene region data mining approach was used to search for new genes and potential mechanisms related to the mentioned trait in cows. Genes related to fertility in cows were searched in the NCBI database, and then, the results were analyzed using GEO2R and the R software. Subsequently, the gene network was created using the String database. The DAVID database was also used to study the biological aspects of genes. Finally, the obtained relationships were visualized using the Cytoscape software.
Results: The findings of this research have shown that many genes including CDK1, PPP2R3C, NDC80, ENY2, WDR12, MRPL27, LAPTM5, C1QB, MCM5 and TPX2 are affected by different biological pathways in endometrial tissue. These effects can affect the fertility of animals in different ways and thus help to improve their production performance, and in other words, the studied genes are able to be regulated through biological pathways in the endometrial tissue of the uterine wall and, as a result, affect things like Affect animal fertility.
Conclusion: This study may allow livestock farmers to implement more optimal strategies to improve animal fertility.
Keywords: Fertility in dairy cattle, Functional proteins, Gene expression, Gene network, Interaction network
Full-Text [PDF 1328 kb]   (406 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
References
1. 1. Kavosi Noder, H., 2017. A review of the efficiency of eCG to control reproduction in dairy cows. The second national conference of new researches in animal science
2. 2. Umesh, S., Arun, K. and Khanna, A., 2010. Non genetic factors affecting age at first calving and first lactation traits in Hariana cows. Indian Veterinary Journal. 87(1): 91-93.
3. 3. Deb, R., Kumar, S., Singh, U., Tyagi, S., Mandal, D. and Sengar, G., 2013. Evaluation of three bovine Y specific microsatellite loci as an alternative biomarker for semen quality traits in crossbred bull. Animal reproduction science. 142(3-4): 121-125. doi: 10.1016/j. anireprosci.2013.09.015
4. 4. Yang, W.C., Li, S.J., Tang, K.Q., Hua, G.H., Zhang, C.Y. and Yu, J.N., 2010. Polymorphisms in the 5′ upstream region of the FSH receptor gene, and their association with superovulation traits in Chinese Holstein cows. Animal reproduction science. 119(3-4): 172-177. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.02.004
5. 5. Salehzadeh, S., Tabatabaei, M., Derakhshandeh, A. and Karbalaei Heidary, H.R., 2020. Design of a fusion gene construct for production of recombinant laterosporulin bacteriocin and bioinformatic analysis for assessing the role of the amino-terminal SH2 domain. Journal of Animal Environment. 12(4): 603-610. doi: 10. 22034/AEJ.2020.131264 (In Persian)
6. 6. McCabe, M., Waters, S., Morris, D., Kenny, D., Lynn, D. and Creevey, C., 2012. RNA-seq analysis of differential gene expression in liver from lactating dairy cows divergent in negative energy balance. BMC genomics. 13(1): 1-11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-193
7. 7. Eftekharmanavi, S., Peyghan, R., Soltani, M., Ghorbanpor, M. and Ghalyanchi Langrodi, A., 2016. Multi-aspect molecular and stractural bioinformatic study of outer membrane protein (OmpTS) of Aeromonas hydrophila common cause of infectious septicemia in fish for immunization goals. Journal of Animal Environment. 8(1): 165-174. (In Persian)
8. 8. Bakir, G., 2004. Estimates of trends components of 305 days milk yield at Holsteincattle's. Journal of Biological Sciences. 4(4): 486-488. doi: 10.3923/jbs.2004.486.488
9. 9. Beerda, B. and Veerkamp, R., 2006. Functional genomics of female reproduction.
10. 10. Hashizume, K., Ushizawa, K., Patel, O.V., Kizaki, K., Imai, K. and Yamada, O., 2006. Gene expression and maintenance of pregnancy in bovine: roles of trophoblastic binucleate cell-specific molecules. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 19(1): 79-90. doi: 10.1071/rd06118
11. 11. Dennis, G., Sherman, B.T., Hosack, D.A., Yang, J., Gao, W., Lane, H.C. and Lempicki, R.A., 2003. DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome biology. 4(9): 1-11. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-r60
12. 12. Mazdoori, Z. and Bakhtiarizade, M.R., 2015. Analysis of the promoter of genes effective in negative energy balance in dairy cows. Livestock products of Aburihan campus agricultural magazine. 18(1): 13-26. https://doi.org/10.22059/jap.2016.56072 (In Persian)
13. 13. Evans, T., Rosenthal, E.T., Youngblom, J., Distel, D. and Hunt, T., 1983. Cyclin: a protein specified by maternal mRNA in sea urchin eggs that is destroyed at each cleavage division. Cell. 33(2): 389-396. doi: 10. 1016/0092-8674(83)90420-8
14. 14. Knoblich, J.A., Sauer, K., Jones, L., Richardson, H., Saint, R. and Lehner, C.F., 1994. Cyclin E controls S phase progression and its down-regulation during Drosophila embryogenesis is required for the arrest of cell proliferation. Cell. 77(1): 107-120. doi: 10.1016/0092. 8674(94)90239-9
15. 15. Diril, M.K., Ratnacaram, C.K., Padmakumar, V., Du, T., Wasser, M. and Coppola, V., 2012. Cyclin dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) is essential for cell division and suppression of DNA re-replication but not for liver regeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(10): 3826-3231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111520 1109
16. 16. Amani, J., Gorjizadeh, N., Younesi, S., Najafi, M., Ashrafi, A.M. and Irian, S., 2021. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) and the DNA damage response: The link between signaling pathways and cancer. DNA repair. 102: 103103. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103103
17. 17. Guran, T., Yesil, G., Turan, S., Atay, Z., Bozkurtlar, E. and Aghayev, A., 2019. PPP2R3C gene variants cause syndromic 46, XY gonadal dysgenesis and impaired spermatogenesis in humans. European Journal of Endocrinology. 180(5): 291-309. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0 067
18. 18. Nilsson, J., 2012. Looping in on Ndc80–how does a protein loop at the kinetochore control chromosome segregation? Bioessays. 34(12): 1070-1077. doi: 10.1002/ bies.201200096
19. 19. Tooley, J. and Stukenberg, P.T., 2011. The Ndc80 complex: integrating the kinetochore's many movements. Chromosome research. 19(3): 377-391. doi: 10.1007/s 10577-010-9180-5
20. 20. Amin, M.A., McKenney, R.J. and Varma, D., 2018. Antagonism between the dynein and Ndc80 complexes at kinetochores controls the stability of kinetochore microtubule attachments during mitosis. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 293(16): 5755-5765. doi: 10.1074/ jbc.RA117.001699
21. 21. Atanassov, B.S., Mohan, R.D., Lan, X., Kuang, X., Lu, Y. and Lin, K., 2016. ATXN7L3 and ENY2 coordinate activity of multiple H2B deubiquitinases important for cellular proliferation and tumor growth. Molecular cell. 62(4): 558-571. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.030
22. 22. Nal, B., Mohr, E., Da Silva, M.I., Tagett, R., Navarro, C. and Carroll, P., 2002. Wdr12, a mouse gene encoding a novel WD-Repeat Protein with a notchless-like amino terminal domain. Genomics. 79(1): 77-86. doi: 10.1006/ geno.2001.6682
23. 23. Ahn, C.S., Cho, H.K., Lee, D.H., Sim, H.J., Kim, S.G. and Pai, H.S., 2016. Functional characterization of the ribosome biogenesis factors PES, BOP1, and WDR12 (PeBoW), and mechanisms of defective cell growth and proliferation caused by PeBoW deficiency in Arabidopsis. Journal of experimental botany. 67(17): 5217-5232. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw288
24. 24. Mi, L., Qi, Q., Ran, H., Chen, L., Li, D. and Xiao, D., 2021. Suppression of ribosome biogenesis by targeting WD repeat domain 12 (WDR12) inhibits glioma stem-like cell growth. Frontiers in oncology. 11: 751792. doi: 10. 3389/fonc.2021.751792
25. 25. Thomas, G., 2000. An encore for ribosome biogenesis in the control of cell proliferation. Nature cell biology. 2(5): E71-E72. doi: 10.1038/35010581
26. 26. Hölzel, M., Rohrmoser, M., Schlee, M., Grimm, T., Harasim, T. and Malamoussi, A., 2005. Mammalian WDR12 is a novel member of the Pes1-Bop1 complex and is required for ribosome biogenesis and cell proliferation. The Journal of cell biology. 170(3): 367-378. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200501141
27. 27. Gur, Y. and Breitbart, H., 2008. Protein synthesis in sperm: dialog between mitochondria and cytoplasm. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 282(1-2): 45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.11.015
28. 28. Zhuang, L., Meng, Z. and Yang, Z., 2021. MRPL27 contributes to unfavorable overall survival and disease-free survival from cholangiocarcinoma patients. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 18(4): 936-943. doi: 10.7150/ijms.50782
29. 29. Chang, C.Y.Y., Lai, M.T., Chen, Y., Yang, C.W., Chang, H.W. and Lu, C.C., 2016. Up-regulation of ribosome biogenesis by MIR196A2 genetic variation promotes endometriosis development and progression. Oncotarget. 7(47): 76713-76725. doi: 10.18632/ oncotarget.11 536
30. 30. Glowacka, W.K., Alberts, P., Ouchida, R., Wang, J.Y. and Rotin, D., 2012. LAPTM5 protein is a positive regulator of proinflammatory signaling pathways in macrophages. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 287(33): 27691-27702. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.355917
31. 31. Adra, C.N., Zhu, S., Ko, J.L., Guillemot, J.C., Cuervo, A.M. and Kobayashi, H., 1996. LAPTM5: a novel lysosomal-associated multispanning membrane protein preferentially expressed in hematopoietic cells. Genomics. 35(2): 328-37. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0364
32. 32. Hu, S., Niu, Y., Wu, D., Hong, D., Wang, N. and Pan, J., 2014. Overexpression of lysosomal- associated protein transmembrane 5 (LAPTM5) deceases autophagy activity via reducing the lysosomal pH value. American Society of Hematology Washington, DC. 124(21). doi: 10.1182/ blood.V124.21.5200.5200
33. 33. Ribas, A. and Wolchok, J.D., 2018. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 359(6382): 1350-1355. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4060
34. 34. Jiang, J., Ding, Y., Wu, M., Lyu, X., Wang, H. and Chen, Y., 2020. Identification of TYROBP and C1QB as two novel key genes with prognostic value in gastric cancer by network analysis. Frontiers in oncology. 10: 1765. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01765
35. 35. Yamada, Y., Arai, T., Kojima, S., Sugawara, S., Kato, M. and Okato, A., 2018. Regulation of antitumor miR‐144‐5p targets oncogenes: direct regulation of syndecan‐3 and its clinical significance. Cancer science. 109(9): 2919-2936. doi: 10.1111/cas.13722
36. 36. Lee, S.K., Kim, C.J., Kim, D.J. and Kang, J.H., 2015. Immune cells in the female reproductive tract. Immune network. 15(1): 16-26. doi: 10.4110/in.2015.15.1.16
37. 37. Sakumoto, R., Hayashi, K.G., Saito, S., Kanahara, H., Kizaki, K. and Iga, K., 2015. Comparison of the global gene expression profiles in the bovine endometrium between summer and autumn. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 61(4):297-303. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2015. 024
38. 38. Stockley, J., Akhand, R., Kennedy, A., Nyberg, C., Crosbie, E. and Edmondson, R., 2020. Detection of MCM5 as a novel non-invasive aid for the diagnosis of endometrial and ovarian tumours. BMC cancer. 20(1): 1000. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07468-y
39. 39. Zhang, B., Zhang, M., Li, Q., Yang, Y., Shang, Z. and Luo, J., 2021. TPX2 mediates prostate cancer epithelial mesenchymal transition through CDK1 regulated phosphorylation of ERK/GSK3β/SNAIL pathway. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 546: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.01.106
40. 40. Chen, M., Zhang, H., Zhang, G., Zhong, A., Ma, Q. and Kai, J., 2018. Targeting TPX2 suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis via repression of the PI3k/AKT/P21 signaling pathway and activation of p53 pathway in breast cancer. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 507(1-4): 74-82. doi: 10. 1016/j.bbrc.2018.10.164
41. 41. Jiang, T., Sui, D., You, D., Yao, S., Zhang, L. and Wang, Y., 2018. RETRACTED ARTICLE: MiR-29a-5p inhibits proliferation and invasion and induces apoptosis in endometrial carcinoma via targeting TPX2. Cell Cycle. 17(10): 1268-1278. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1475 829
42. 42. Chevalier, S. and Blow, J.J., 1996. Cell cycle control of replication initiation in eukaryotes. Current opinion in cell biology. 8(6): 815-821. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(96)80 082-2
43. 43. Burgers, P.M. and Kunkel, T.A., 2017. Eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Annual review of biochemistry. 86: 417-438. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044709
44. 44. Weis, B.L., Kovacevic, J., Missbach, S. and Schleiff, E., 2015. Plant-specific features of ribosome biogenesis. Trends in Plant Science. 20(11): 729-740. doi: 10.1016/j. tplants.2015.07.003
45. 45. Oliver, E.R., Saunders, T.L., Tarlé, S.A. and Glaser, T., 2004. Ribosomal protein L24 defect in belly spot and tail (Bst), a mouse Minute. Development. 131(16): 3907-3920. doi: 10.1242/dev.01268
46. 46. Voutev, R., Killian, D.J., Ahn, J.H. and Hubbard, E.J.A., 2006. Alterations in ribosome biogenesis cause specific defects in C. elegans hermaphrodite gonadogenesis. Developmental biology. 298(1): 45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.06.011
47. 47. Freed, E.F., Bleichert, F., Dutca, L.M. and Baserga, S.J., 2010. When ribosomes go bad: diseases of ribosome biogenesis. Molecular BioSystems. 6(3): 481-493. doi: 10.1039/b919670f
48. 48. Zhang, N., Hartig, H., Dzhagalov, I., Draper, D. and He, Y.W., 2005. The role of apoptosis in the development and function of T lymphocytes. Cell research. 15(10): 749-769. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290345
49. 49. Sena, L.A., Li, S., Jairaman, A., Prakriya, M., Ezponda, T. and Hildeman, D.A., 2013. Mitochondria are required for antigen-specific T cell activation through reactive oxygen species signaling. Immunity. 38(2): 225-236. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.10.020
50. 50. Waldmann, H., Graca, L., Cobbold, S., Adams, E., Tone, M. and Tone, Y., 2004. Regulatory T cells and organ transplantation. Seminars in immunology. Elsevier. Semin Immunol. 16(2): 119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.smim. 2003.12.007
51. 51. Sabatos, C.A., Doh, J., Chakravarti, S., Friedman, R.S., Pandurangi, P.G., Tooley, A.J. and Krummel, M.F., 2008. A synaptic basis for paracrine interleukin-2 signaling during homotypic T cell interaction. Immunity. 29(2): 238-248. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.05.017
52. 52. Gahmberg, C.G., Tolvanen, M. and Kotovuori, P., 1997. Leukocyte adhesion: Structure and function of human leukocyte β2‐integrins and their cellular ligands. European journal of biochemistry. 245(2): 215-232. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00215.x
53. 53. Bulmer, J.N. and Lash, G.E., 2005. Human uterine natural killer cells: a reappraisal. Molecular immunology. 42(4): 511-521. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.07.035
54. 54. Trundley, A. and Moffett, A., 2004. Human uterine leukocytes and pregnancy. Tissue antigens. 63(1): 1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2004.00170.x
55. 55. Schmahl, J., Eicher, E.M., Washburn, L.L. and Capel, B., 2000. Sry induces cell proliferation in the mouse gonadxs. Development. 127(1): 65-73. doi: 10.1242/dev. 127.1.65
56. 56. Frost, E.R., Taylor, G., Baker, M.A., Lovell-Badge, R. and Sutherland, J.M., 2021. Establishing and maintaining fertility: the importance of cell cycle arrest. Genes & Development. 35(9-10): 619-634. doi: 10.1101/ gad.348151.120
57. 57. Norris, K., Hopes, T. and Aspden, J.L., 2021. Ribosome heterogeneity and specialization in development. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: RNA. 12(4): e1644. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1644
58. 58. Bansal, S.K., Gupta, N., Sankhwar, S.N. and Rajender, S., 2015. Differential genes expression between fertile and infertile spermatozoa revealed by transcriptome analysis. PloS one. 10(5): e0127007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127007
59. 59. Zsögön, A., Szakonyi, D., Shi, X. and Byrne, M.E., 2017. Ribosomal protein RPL27a 2014promotes female gametophyte development in a dose-dependent manner. Plant Physiology. 165(3): 1133-1143. doi: 10.1104/pp. 114.241778
60. 60. Ivanovs, A., Rybtsov, S., Ng, E.S., Stanley, E.G., Elefanty, A.G. and Medvinsky, A., 2017. Human haematopoietic stem cell development: from the embryo to the dish. Development. 144(13): 2323-2337. doi: 10. 1242/dev.134866
61. 61. Robb, L., Elefanty, A. and Begley, C., 1999. Transcriptional control of hematopoiesis. Ex Vivo Cell Therapy. 5-26.
62. 62. Yoshida, M., 2001. Multiple viral strategies of HTLV-1 for dysregulation of cell growth control. Annual review of immunology. 19(1): 475-496. doi: 10.1146/annurev. immunol.19.1.475
63. 63. Pan, X., Chen, Y. and Shu, H., 2019. Rich dynamics in a delayed HTLV-I infection model: Stability switch, multiple stable cycles, and torus. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 479(2): 2214-2235. doi: 10. 1016/j.jmaa.2019.07.051
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farhangfar S H, Zeya M, Behdani E, Montazertorbati M. Fit protein interaction network based on gene expression data for dairy cattle fertilit. , Journalaer. 2025; 1 (4) :1-12
URL: http://journalaer.com/article-1-42-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 4 (12-2025) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش های محیط زیست جانوری Journal of Animal Environmental Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4780